[Preface – you will note that many of the names given here may have
several spellings/pronunciations. The translation of Native American names into
English is not an exact one since these languages are generally not written and
so one writes down what they heard. Also, while I use the term “Indian” here, I
recognize that we now call these people groups Native Americans, but the places
I am using for reference were written long ago and the term “Indian” was still
in use at the time.]
A long-time friend of mine, John Moser, and his wife will be
celebrating their 30th anniversary shortly. In preparation, he
recently posted on Facebook that their plans were to be traveling to NY for
research on his wife’s book about the Moravian settlement wiped out in
Shekomeko and then five days running around the Berkshires. This made me start
wondering where Shekomeko was and the history that she would be researching.
A quick search using Google Maps indicated that Shekomeko was located
in the town of Northeast in Dutchess County, NY – just to the east of the NW corner of CT. My Russell ancestors lived in Dutchess County from around 1730
when Robert Russell came to America from Scotland until the family moved just
across the border to Kent, CT some time right after the Civil War. I am quite
familiar with the history of that part of NY/CT because of the research that I
have done on my ancestors over the past several years.
Algonquian/Algonquin Indians
[Native Americans]
Another series of searches led me to some of the history of the Mahican
Indians (also called the Mohicans (*1), the name I had known growing up) in
Shekomeko and the involvement of the Moravians (*2). The Moravians had settled
in Bethlehem, PA, in the late 1730s. They were then looking for a group of native
peoples to preach to and convert and so sent Christian Henry Rauch to New York
City in 1740 to locate a native people group. He met there with a delegation of
Mahican Indians. They were a part of the Algonquian tribe who lived in eastern
Dutchess County and western Connecticut. Rauch discovered that he could converse
with them in Dutch as they were acquainted with the language from their contact
with Dutch settlements along the Hudson (note that these Dutch settlements
included my wife’s Van De Car ancestors who were living at the time about 20
miles NW of Shekomeko in the area of Kinderhook, NY.)
But the fact that these were Algonquian Indians triggered other
connections to me. The first was that another small group of this same nation
inhabited the town where I grew up, Wolcott, CT, and I have previously written
about them (*3). Wolcott was in the early stages of being settled beginning in
the 1730s, so this would have been contemporaneous with the Moravian work in
the 1740s. (As a side note, for our senior high class night, I was the MC and
my stage name was “Algonquin Godperson”.)
This reminded me that the author of the history of Wolcott, which I
have relied on for many previous blogs, was Samuel Orcutt (*4). While the
history of Wolcott was his first published work, he went on to write several
other history books, one of which was “The Indians of the Housatonic and
Naugatuck Valleys” in 1882 (*5). The northwest corner of CT is part of the
Housatonic Valley and I recommended that John’s wife consider that as good background
material for her research.
Moravians
While the Wikipedia article (*2) has a good summary, I thought I should
read Samuel Orcutt’s book as well to see what else it might say. While it is
available through Google books, I also purchased a Kindle version of it. Surprisingly,
there were a several of chapters on the Moravians, so I had much more reading
to do than I thought.
I won’t give away the whole story here, but as a brief overview, the
Moravians only worked among the Mahican for about 6 years (1740-1746). At the
end of that period, the remaining Indians at Shekomeko (only 44 of them) left
and dispersed to Pennsylvania and east to the mission at Pachgatgoch. There
were far more details on this in Orcutt’s book (*5). It was initially quite
hard to get further details in public sources since the name Pachgatgoch has
very few references, but I was able to determine that this is an alternate
spelling (one of 12!) of the word Schaghticoke (*6) which is derived from the Algonquian
word Pishgachtigok. (For one of the few times in my career, I made an update to
Wikipedia so that future individuals will have a link to follow!)
One of the things that surprised me was that Count Zinzendorf (*7), who
had a significant influence on the Moravian church and was responsible for its
revival in the 1720s, was also heavily involved in the Moravian work at
Shekomeko, as he made personal visits there. He also stopped in New Milford,
CT, on his way back in late 1742 (as recorded in (*5)).
Ancestors
Because this tribe of Native Americans occupied a sizable area
(especially given that there were relatively few of them), it was not only the
Moravians who interacted with them. Those who lived at Shekomeko were not
appreciated by the local settlers. As noted in (*2), the local colonists
offered rum to the Mahicans if they would kill the missionaries. The
missionaries themselves were detained, interrogated, fined and released. In
1744 the governor of NY ordered the missionaries to “desist from further
teaching and depart the province.” Fortunately, Orcutt has a recorded a lot of
detail about where the remainder of the tribe dispersed to (*5). But in
Connecticut, where the tribe was not viewed with quite so much hostility, there
were others besides the Moravians who interacted with them. Thus, in addition
to the tribe’s interaction with my wife’s ancestors along the Hudson River,
some of my own ancestors played a part in this story.
Orcutt’s book mentions several individuals from the town of New Milford
who took part in these interactions. These include Anthony Stoddard and Lt. Colonel
Preston who in May 1741 on the petition of a local Indian were appointed to
take care “that the said Indian be instructed according to his desire, and that
his children be schooled and taught the principles of the Christian religion,
and victualled, and that twenty pounds of the money raised by contribution be
improved in said service.” The text of the petition may be found in (*8).
Then in 1742 the Rev. Daniel Boardman and Samuel Canfield were appointed
to like service to the Indians of New Milford. Boardman is remembered to this
day by Boardman Road in New Milford which is carried over the Housatonic River
by Boardman’s Bridge (*9). Samuel Canfield is my great*7 grandfather. (My
father’s maternal grandmother was Caroline Northrup, her grandmother was Catherine
Canfield, the great-great-granddaughter of Samuel Canfield (1702-1754).)
The Aftermath
Despite the efforts of both the Moravians as well as the above
individuals from New Milford, the English colonists in the area were mostly
successful in driving away both the Moravians as well as nearly all the members
of the Mohican tribe. Many of them migrated first to the area around Bethlehem,
PA to be with their Moravian friends. But even here there were difficulties and
they had to keep moving westward to escape persecution. Some of the Mahicans
were among a larger group of Native Americans who had travelled west to Ohio
where a group of individuals massacred 96 of them in the Gnadenhutten massacre
in 1781 (*10). Others migrated to Canada where they were able to live
peacefully. Only a handful remained behind in the New Milford area where there
is still a small reservation in Kent, CT (*6). Orcutt listed the remaining
handful of these in his book in 1882 (*5).
This is not a happy story. But we should learn from both the Moravian
brethren as well as the few men from New Milford, my ancestors among them, who
acted with kindness toward the Native Americans in their midst.
Notes
*5 – The Indians of the Housatonic and Naugatuck Valleys, by Samuel Orcutt,
1882
*8 – History of Ancient Woodbury, Connecticut: From the First Indian
Deed in 1659 … Including the Present Towns of Washington, Southbury, Bethlehem,
Roxbury, and a part of Oxford and Middlebury, by William Cothren, pp. 103-104