I’ve written a few times before about the origin of family names. This time, I’d like to first explore some of the various “rules” and timing of family names in general. Then I’ll look at the four family names coming from my parents and my wife’s parents. Finally, I have some new information about my wife’s maiden name (i.e., her father’s family name - VanDeCar).
Surnames
There is a great article in Wikipedia about surnames (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surname).
It gets into a lot of detail which I’ll not attempt to replicate here. But
there are a few types of surnames that are involved in the family history below
that I’d like to refer to.
Patronymic surnames – These are some of the oldest
and most common type of surnames where the surname is based on the name of one’s
father. There are examples in many different countries/cultures, such as the Scandinavian
(Peterson = son of Peter), Scottish (MacDonald = son of Donald). There is another
whole article in Wikipedia just devoted to this topic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patronymic).
Occupational surnames – These developed in different
countries at different times, but they are very common in the English-speaking
world where they developed around the Middle Ages. Some good examples that come
to mind are Smith, Baker, Miller, Shoemaker, Cook, etc.
Toponymic surnames – These are derived from locations
or things in nature. Examples include such things as Washington (town/homestead
of Wassa family). Some of these names are habitation (place) names, others may
be topographic (geographic features).
Examples from my family and my wife’s family
My father’s surname was Russell, my mother’s maiden name was
Pierpont, my wife’s mother’s maiden name was Wright, and my wife’s father’s
surname was VanDeCar. Let’s look at each of these in turn.
Russell – I’ve addressed this name on a couple of
occasions before (see https://ramblinrussells.blogspot.com/2015/04/genealogy-story-my-norman-ancestors.html
and https://ramblinrussells.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-russell-family-name.html).
The origin of this toponymic surname is during the time of the Norman
occupation of northern France, where a man with the name Hugh became the baron
of a small town called Rozel or Roussel – thus becoming Hugh de Rozel or Hugh
de Roussel (literally Hugh of/from Rozel/Roussel). This is a good example of
the toponymic surname convention used by “royalty” at the time since Hugh was a
baron. The family went to England during the Norman invasion of 1066, where the
“de” part was dropped and the spelling modified to Russell and there was later
a Russell clan in Scotland. The Russells in the US are from various immigrants
from both the English and Scottish lines.
Pierpont – I’ve also addressed this name before (see https://ramblinrussells.blogspot.com/2015/04/genealogy-story-my-norman-ancestors.html).
Another man, also Hugh and also a baron, had a castle in Normandy (just 15
miles from the town of Rozel). But he took this toponymic family name not from
a town, but from the well-known stone bridge which was in front of the castle.
In French this would have been “Pierre” (stone) “Pont” (bridge), so he was Hugh
de Pierrepont. This name with that spelling is still found today with some of
my distant French cousins. When Hugh’s grandson went to England as part of the
Norman invasion, they dropped the “de” part and the name became Pierrepont and
that name may still be found there today. As the family spread throughout
England, there were variant spelling including Pierpont, Pierpoynt, Pierpoint,
and others. These variations can also be found throughout the US as there were
several individuals who immigrated here at different times. My mother’s family
is descended from John Pierpont who came to New England around 1640, but there
is also a branch of Pierpoints who are the descendants of Henry Pierpoint who
came to Maryland around the same time.
Wright – this is an example of an occupational surname
that originated in England several centuries after the toponymic names above. There
are more specific occupations that had separate names – such as Cartwright or
Wainwright, but this is the more “generic” occupation from that time period.
VanDeCar – this surname originated in the Hudson
River Valley in the mid-1600s (see http://ramblinrussells.blogspot.com/2017/03/genealogy-story-vandecar-family.html).
At the time this was part of New Netherlands and was occupied by the Dutch. The
Dutch prior to this time used a patronymic naming system where surnames had a
suffix of “sz” (short for son of) or “je” (short for daughter of) leading to
such names as “Feytje Claesz Van Schaack” (my wife’s great*7 grandmother). The
oldest ancestor in the male VanDeCar line that anyone has been able to trace was
Dirk Van Der Karre/Karr/Kerr (1637-1727) (there were several alternate
spellings), Since Van Der Karre (and its many more recent derivatives such as
VanDecar, VanDeCar, Vandecar, etc.) is only found in the US, it was presumed
that the adaptation of this name which means “from/of the Kerre” was from that
time period. But no one had been able to find anything back in the Netherlands named
“Kerre” (or Karre or Karr) from which it might have been derived as a toponymic
surname.
Some new information
I recently became aware of a posting that someone had made
on a message board which stated “An early American ancestor of mine, Dirk van
der Kerr, was always presumed Dutch. But recent DNA tests show matches with the
Scottish Carr (Kerr) family. Looks like some of the Carrs left Scotland for
Holland.”
In contacting this individual (whose mother’s maiden name
was spelled VanDecar), I learned that the family had done some y-DNA testing
(which traces the male line only as the DNA is from the Y chromosome). This
y-DNA testing can go back farther than the typical DNA testing which is looking
for common segments of DNA on multiple chromosomes. And this testing revealed
that there were a number of individuals in Scotland in the Kerr family who were
in the same haplo-group, i.e., who shared that portion of the Y chromosome.
This is an exciting discovery!
If correct, this means that when Dirk gave his surname as “Van
Der Kerre” he meant Dirk “from the Kerre (clan)”. So, the derivation history of
the name was “de Ker” (Norman meaning “from Ker”) to “Kerr” (Scottish surname
of the Kerr clan), to “van der Kerre” (Dutch meaning “of the Kerr clan”) to
today’s “VanDeCar” (or VanDecar or Vandecar) with the sound equivalence of “Car”
and “Kerre”.
There is an excellent Wikipedia article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clan_Kerr)
which has the whole history of this clan/surname and which includes the
following information:
·
Name has several variant spellings including
Kerr, Kear, Carr, Carre, and Cares
·
“Name stems from the Old Norse jkarr
which means marsh dweller, and came to Scotland from Normandy”
·
“During the reign of David I (1082-1153), Hugh
de Morville, Lord High Constable of Scotland [note that Morville was another
town quite close to Rozel and the Pierrepont castle in Normandy], granted lands
to the Norman family of William de Ker (William from Ker).” Believed to be the
Normandy town of Criel, renamed Criel-sur-Mer in 1902.
This means that the name is not a patronymic surname, but
rather is a toponymic surname after the town of Ker in Normandy (just like the
Russell surname) – albeit with a rather complicated path from Normandy to
Scotland to The Netherlands, and finally to the Americas.
Isn’t history fun?!
[maps of Rozel, etc. in Normandy]