The
US Census is taken every ten years.
While the census results are a rich source of information for doing
genealogy research, there are a number of ways that incorrect/misleading
information can make it more difficult that one might think. Unlike the past few times that the census has
been taken where forms are mailed to each home for completion, the census forms
used to be filled in by hand by a census taker.
Consider the following micro-steps that are involved in capturing this
information:
1) The
census form, which is different every time it is given, consists of a large
number of columns of information that must be captured for each individual.
2) The
wording of each column must be converted to a full sentence question by the
individual who is responsible for filling in the questionnaire, i.e. the census
taker.
3) The
census taker knocks on the door and asks the person who answers the door the
questions for all members of the household.
4) The
questions are asked in English.
5) The
resident hears the question and has to determine exactly what is being asked.
6) The
resident has to know the answer for each household member.
7) The
resident answers each question.
8) The
census writes down what he/she believed they heard.
Every
one of these small steps is prone to a certain amount of error. Consider the following examples:
A) If
the column is labeled “Age,” the question might be “How old is the person?” If you have a child who has a birthday in
just a few days and is almost 10, you might answer, “10”. But if the question is “How old were they at
their last birthday?”, then you would answer “9”.
B) If
the column is “Number of children” and you had three living children and had
had two miscarriages, then you might answer initially “3”, but if the next
column is “How many living”, then you would have to answer “3” and correct your
previous answer to “5”.
C) The
resident might not have very good English skills, or not very good
pronunciation, so the census taker might not record the proper spelling. (One of my ancestors was Hester Russell and
in one census it was recorded “Ester Russel”.
An ancestor with the last name of Kowalski was recorded with four
different spelling.
D) If
you give the names of your children, unless you indicate otherwise, the census
taker will assume that the last names were the same as yours, but they might
not be. (One of my wife’s ancestors had
some children from a prior marriage, but she was widowed and had re-married. Those children, who had not been officially
adopted, were recorded under the last name of their step-father instead of
noting their legal last name.)
E) As
time goes by, you might not remember exact dates (one of my wife’s ancestors
recorded three different years for her immigration to the US on three
consecutive census records. Another
recorded different birth years for her husband on different census records.)
F) People
sometimes go by their nicknames or middle names (especially if they share a
first name with a parent). So the child
of Wilhelmina is recorded in the census as “Mina” and Catharine Elizabeth
Russell is listed in some census records as “Catharine” and in others as “Elizabeth”.
G) The
census taker might make improper assumptions.
When one of my Russell ancestors had their granddaughter staying with
them for the summer (which was the time of the year when the census taker paid
a visit), her name was given as “Catharine Simmons”, but the census taker
assumed that Simmons was a middle name and so indented the recording,
improperly causing her to be listed as “Russell, Catharine Simmons”.
H) Sometimes
the resident being asked the questions might not know the answer, or might
assume something that is not correct. So
they might incorrectly indicate that their spouse’s parents were born in the
same state as their spouse, but that might not be correct.
All
the above are real examples of some of the incorrect recording that I have
encountered just in researching my and my wife’s relatives. In searching for census records sometimes you
have to use “fuzzy logic” since exact, correct answers might not have been
recorded.
Other Information Issues
There
are a host of other information sources beyond the census records. While some of the same issues such as
misheard information exist in these other sources, there are other problems as
well.
Inconsistency
between states – some states, like Massachusetts, had a fairly rigorous
recording for births, marriages, deaths, etc.
But just across the border in upstate New York the methods were less
rigorous and so finding information about individuals is much harder.
In-state
census – New York actually took a census every five years, so for years like
1865, there is a New York census, but surrounding states only participated in
the federal census.
That is true... I learned some of these when I took a short genealogy course. The census takers were not allowed to ask how to spell a name (partly because a lot of people were illiterate and may not have been able to spell names).... so the spelling of the name fell directly to the census taker and depended on what they heard as the name, thus a lot of different spelling occurred.
ReplyDelete