Day 7 – What tattoos you have and if they have meaning
Well, this one is easy – I have no tattoos, and thus they have no meaning. But since this is a writing challenge, let me discourse on the subject of tattoos.
It’s not exactly a secret that I’m pretty conservative – as are
many people of my generation. So my views on tattoos are also pretty
conservative. I have no particular problem with the “discrete” use of tattoos
for those who want to endure the pain of getting them. This would include ones
such as ladies with an “ankle chain” or a small butterfly on the back of the
shoulder or the small of the back, or for men the name of their wife or
something else significant such as their military service on the upper arm.
Most of these are not visible when the person is wearing clothing, except for
beachwear or things like “muscle shirts”. It’s not for me, but I’m ok with
others doing so.
But it’s the more recent trends of the large, highly visible,
tattoos that I think are inappropriate. These include such ones as the “sleeve”
which covers the entire arm from shoulder to wrist, or other large ones which
cover portions of the body such as the upper torso and neck. There are also
ones which are used to identify members of a gang, and highly colored ones
which are meant for display. Also tattoos are now being placed on different
parts of the body such as the face, ears, fingers and hands, etc. To my way of
thinking, if one is dressed for work – whether formal or “business casual” –
and the tattoo is showing, then it’s not appropriate.
This new tattoo trend is something that has only happened in the
last 40 or so years and while it seems to be an acceptable form of “art” to the
younger generations, I still say that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder”
and these new forms, while they may be highly elaborate and “artistic” are not
beautiful to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment