In a blog I wrote recently (http://ramblinrussells.blogspot.com/2017/03/genealogy-story-harvard-and-yale.html),
I gave a list of the ten men who were involved in establishing the Collegiate
School of Connecticut in 1701 – which became Yale just a few years later. In
that blog, I described these men as follows:
·
Samuel
Andrew (1656-1738), Harvard class of 1675, pastor in Milford, CT – Rector in
1707-1719, while at Harvard was a tutor to James Pierpont, Samuel Russell,
Noadiah Russell, and Joseph Webb. He and Samuel Mather married sisters. His
granddaughter married the grandson of Noadiah Russell and James Pierpont.
·
Thomas
Buckingham (1646-1709), the only non-Harvard graduate, pastor in Saybrook, CT –
the founders originally agreed to locate the Collegiate School in Saybrook and
it was only with much resistance that it was relocated to New Haven.
·
Israel
Chauncy (1644-1703), pastor in Stratford, CT – son of Charles Chauncy,
president of Harvard, he and James Webb married sisters. In addition to his
father, a brother and nephew were also ministers.
·
Samuel
Mather (1650-1727), Harvard class of 1671, pastor in Windsor, CT – cousin of
Cotton Mather
·
Rev. James
Noyes II (1640-1719), Harvard class of 1659, pastor in Stonington, CT – a
cousin to Timothy Woodbridge, father, grandfather, and other relatives were
also ministers.
·
James
Pierpont (1659-1714), Harvard class of 1681, pastor in New Haven, CT – related
to Abraham Pierson by one marriage and to Thomas Buckingham by another
marriage. His children married descendants of Noadiah Russell, Samuel Russell,
and James Noyes. Five of his children either became ministers or were married
to one. (See http://ramblinrussells.blogspot.com/2017/02/genealogy-story-james-pierpont.html
for further details).
·
Abraham
Pierson (1646-1707), Harvard class of 1668, pastor in Killingworth, CT (later
renamed Clinton) – first Rector of the Collegiate School, was supposed to teach
in Saybrook, but due to his pastoral duties, taught at his parsonage in
Killingworth. Son of a minister.
·
Noadiah
Russell (1659-1713), Harvard class of 1681, pastor in Middletown, CT – two of
his sons also became ministers.
·
Joseph
Webb (1666-1732), Harvard class of 1684, pastor in Fairfield, CT
·
Timothy Woodbridge
(1655-1732), pastor in Hartford, CT – son of a minister, his brother and son
were also ministers. His daughter married a son of Abraham Pierson.
·
Samuel
Russell (1660-1731), Harvard class of 1681, pastor in Branford, CT – 2nd
son of Rev. John Russell (1626-1692) of Hadley, MA, Harvard 1645, ministered in
Wethersfield CT 1650-1659, then left CT and founded Hadley MA.
I’ve now had a chance to do some further genealogical
research on these individuals with the goal of seeing what their connection (if
any) is to me. I expected to find some of the below, but the degree of
connectedness is pretty astounding. So, without further ado, here is how each
of these men is related to me.
·
Samuel Andrew, grandfather-in-law of William Russell
(my 1st cousin 7 times removed)
·
Thomas Buckingham, 2nd husband of
Mary [Willet] [Hooker] whose first husband was my great*8 uncle
·
Israel Chauncy, married to 1st cousin
of my great*8 grandfather, Abraham Nichols. His wife and Joseph Webb’s wife
were sisters.
·
Samuel Mather, cousin of sister-in-law of James
Pierpont (through his first wife)
·
James Noyes II, father-in-law of Abigail
Pierpont (my great*7 aunt)
·
James Pierpont, great*7 grandfather His children
married descendants of, Samuel Russell
·
Abraham Pierson, uncle of first wife of James
Pierpont
·
Noadiah Russell, great*7 grandfather, his
daughter married Joseph Pierpont.
·
Joseph Webb, married to 1st cousin of
my great*8 grandfather, Abram Nichols
·
Timothy Woodbridge. His daughter married a son
of Abraham Pierson. Also a cousin of James Noyes II.
·
Samuel Russell, great*3 grandfather of my
great*3 aunt, Abigail [Russell] Pierpont
While some of these connections are multiple “hops”, e.g.
cousin of a cousin sort-of-thing, the fact that I can document a family
connection to every single one of them seems pretty amazing to me. And it is further demonstration of what I
quoted in that earlier blog:
The
clergy, unlike farmers or artisans, were relatively successful in developing
effective local and trans-local alliances which, in turn, led to patterns of
collective action and to formal corporate institutions. This is not surprising,
for the clergy were, by their very nature, a group with clearly defined common
interests, a group whose members had been trained together at either Harvard or
Yale (thus having shared an intensive common socialization experience), who
were often sons of clergymen themselves (thus having kin-continuity), and who
presided over a social institution, the church, whose interests they had a
vital interest in preserving. The clergy, as earlier suggested, followed
simultaneously two patterns of alliance-making, a bifurcation dictated by the
non-inheritable nature of the clerical office. On the one hand, they cultivated
close ties with important lay families in the communities in which they served,
which strengthened their power in their congregations and opened up
occupational opportunities for their sons. On the other hand, they cultivated
trans-local alliances with other clergymen (to consolidate professional
identity) and with powerful laymen (to further the interests of the church).
Great work, Alan! From another Harvard Man (but not a Pastor)
ReplyDelete