My
mother’s maiden name is Pierpont and my father’s (duh!) is Russell. But the history of these two family names has
some remarkable parallels which I have only recently discovered.
Norman Beginnings
Both
of these names have their origins in northern France. The area around Normandy had been settled by
the Vikings in the early 900s, so the families there likely were of Viking
origin.
The
earliest that the Pierpont name has been traced is to Sir Hugh de Pierrepont
who was born in the 900s. He was the
lord of a castle which had a stone bridge nearby which had been built by
Charlemagne and from which the castle was named (Pierre=stone, pont=bridge). The Chronicle of Flodoard refers to Castrum
Petraepontis as an important place in 938.
You can find Saint-Saveur-de-Pierrepont in France today on the peninsula
which juts out of the north side of France to the west of Normandy. In 1066, Hugh’s son, Robert de Pierrepont,
went to England with the army of William the Conqueror.
Around
the same time, and not far away, there was another family (traced back to the
900’s as well), headed by Hugh Bertrand (born in 1012). Hugh became lord of Barneville and le Rozel,
thus making himself Hugh de Rozel (or de Roussel). His castle was in le Rozel, France, a small
village only 15 miles from the de Pierrepont castle. Being in such close proximity, and both being
lords of castles, it’s reasonable to conclude that the two lords knew each
other. Hugh also went to England with
William the Conqueror.
Two
families, two lords, two men travelling to England.
The English Years
Initially,
both families settled in the southern coastal area of England. They also both anglicized their names.
The
de Roussel/Rozel family became the Russell family and settled near Dorset, in
what is now called Kingston Russell, directly across the English Channel from
their French home. The de Pierrepont
family became the Pierpont family and initially settled in Lewes, near
Brighton, a bit farther to the east, then shortly moving to Wrentham, farther
up the eastern coast.
Over
time, both families also moved farther north.
The Russell family settled in Strensham (about halfway between
Birmingham and Bristol). The Pierpont
family moved to Holme Pierrepont, near Nottingham, where they built their
country manor house (which still exists).
Thus, both the Russell and Pierpont families still have English towns
named after them.
Both
families, also being upper class families, became involved in governmental
affairs. Several of the Russell family
were knighted (becoming Sir ___ Russell), and served in parliament. Several of the Pierpont family were also
knighted (becoming Sir ___ Pierpont). A
few of them served as the Sheriff of Nottingham (which many may remember from
the Robin Hood stories), and one was even killed in Sherwood Forest.
Two
families, two place names in England, two knighted families.
Moving to America
After
a several hundred years of being in England, a new continent across the
Atlantic became known. The English
wanted to secure these new lands for themselves, and so many English families made
the long journey to the “New World.” The
Russell and Pierpont families were no exception. Both families participated in what was known
as the “Great Migration.” This term
refers to the migration of English settlers, primarily Puritans to
Massachusetts in the period 1620 to 1640.
They came in family groups (rather than isolated individuals) and were
motivated chiefly by a quest for freedom to practice their Puritan religion.
The
Russell family was headed by Robert Russell who arrived in 1640 and settled in
Andover, MA. The same year John Pierpont
migrated and purchased land in Ipswich, MA.
Two
families, having originally been only 15 miles apart, moved to England in the
same year, also left England in the same year, and now are once again only 15
miles apart.
American Generations
Like
most of the families who came to Boston in that time period, these two families
began to spread and settle in other parts of New England.
Robert
Russell’s grandson, also named Robert, moved from Andover, MA to Kent, NY, just
to the west of the NY/CT border in the mid-1700s. By the mid-1800s the family had moved just
across the border to New Milford, CT. It
was there that my grandfather was born and married. But in the 1920s he moved to Waterbury, CT as
that was an industrial city that offered jobs during the depression.
John
Pierpont’s son, James, got his religious education at Harvard and moved to New
Haven, CT in the 1680s where he became the pastor of the Congregational Church
there. His descendants stayed in the New
Haven area until 1781 when his great-grandson, Ezra, moved north to Prospect,
CT, then in 1801 to Waterbury, CT. The
Pierpont family had large land holdings in Waterbury.
The Family Lines Join
In
the 1940s my father was living with his grandparents in Waterbury. He was attending the young adults group at a
church just two blocks away, Mill Plain Union Church. Also part of that young adults group were
several members of the Pierpont family, including my mother, who lived less
than two miles to the east. That
association led to my parents meeting and eventually marrying in 1946,
following my father’s WWII service.
The
two families, who had begun in northern France 1000 years prior and just 15
miles apart, who had moved to England in the same year, who had migrated to
American in the same year where they were once again 15 miles apart, and via
different paths had found themselves in the same city and less than two miles
apart, were finally joined together.
What an amazing journey!
Wow - Amazing!!!
ReplyDeleteUpdate 12/27/17 - Recent research has uncovered the fact that my great*6 grandfather, Robert Russell, was not a migrant from MA to NY. Rather, he was an immigrant to NY, likely from Scotland, around 1750. Since it is nearly impossible to trace the Russell family back through Scottish history, I cannot say where they were before that. However, Scottish tradition is that they are descended from the same Baron de Rozel in Normandy as indicated above. So my migration path above is incorrect, but may have the same ending.
ReplyDeleteTracing my ancestry back as far as I can and found Hugh de Rozel as my 33rd great grandfather. Hello, distant cousin
ReplyDeleteHugh is my 26th GG, so I’m a few generations ahead, I would love to compare family tree/ notes and see where we tie in. Let me know if your interested .
DeleteTake Care,
Crussell3@me.com
If you are still on this site contact me as there is a published book I have found with our family history and migration / relation that is in my local library with the history of the Russells beyond the French connection and has legitimate source references to help connect the dots. I too am a Russell and have a rich family history in New England. My ancestory tree extends back far beyond the de Roussel / Rozel line. I also have noted several interesting things within the family line and would love to chat more to compare notes.
ReplyDeleteRegards C-
Crussell3@me.com
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteHe is my 26th gg...any more information on the family? And what is the name of the book you mentioned above?
ReplyDeleteThe book is one that was found by Crussell3@me.com, so I do not know it's name. You'd have to contact him directly. My Russell line is me <- Vernon (1920-2006) <- Erskine (1894-1970) <- Louis (1870-1946) <- Walter (1852-1895) <- Silas (1803-1886) <- Caleb (1774-1830) <- John (1756-1833) <- Robert (1730-1811). Robert was an illiterate farmer from Scotland. The line from him back to Normandy is uncertain as in Scotland the Russell family is an armigerous clan and there are few records available.
DeleteMy name is Roger Russell. I have census records that I used to trace my Confederate ancestors. My branch of this family came to Virginia in the 1640’s. John Russell was the first Russell to come to the colonies from my batch of this family.
Delete